Langkau ke kandungan utama

How to bring a government down

dari Changkat Ning

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Westminster system

The Westminster system is a democratic parliamentary system of government modelled after the British government (the Parliament of the United Kingdom). The term comes from the Palace of Westminster, the seat of the UK Parliament.

The system is a series of procedures for operating a legislature. It is used, or was once used, in the national legislatures and sub-national legislatures of most Commonwealth and ex-Commonwealth nations, beginning with the Canadian provinces and Australian colonies in the mid-19th century. There are other parliamentary systems whose procedures differ considerably from the Westminster system.

Key characteristics

Important features of the Westminster system include the following, although not all of the following aspects have been preserved in every Westminster-derived system:

* a sovereign or head of state who is the nominal or theoretical holder of executive power, and holds numerous reserve powers, but whose daily duties mainly consist of performing the role of a ceremonial figurehead. Examples include the British monarch, the presidents of many countries and state/provincial governors in federal systems.

* a head of government (or head of the executive), known as the prime minister (PM), premier or first minister, who is officially appointed by the head of state. In practice, the head of government is almost always the leader of the largest elected party in parliament.

* a de facto executive branch usually made up of members of the legislature with the senior members of the executive in a cabinet led by the head of government; such members execute executive authority on behalf of the nominal or theoretical executive authority.

* parliamentary opposition (a multi-party system).

* an elected legislature, often bicameral, in which at least one house is elected, although unicameral systems also exist; legislative members are usually elected by district in first-past-the-post elections (as opposed to country-wide proportional representation).(In this case, New Zealand presents an interesting change given its shift to proportional representation.)

* a lower house of parliament with an ability to dismiss a government by "withholding (or blocking) Supply" (rejecting a budget), passing a motion of no confidence, or defeating a confidence motion. The Westminster system enables a government to be defeated, or forced into a general election, independently of a new government being chosen.

* a parliament which can be dissolved and elections called at any time.

* parliamentary privilege, which allows the Legislature to discuss any issue deemed by itself to be relevant, without fear of consequences stemming from defamatory statements or records thereof.

* minutes of meetings, often known as Hansard, including an ability for the legislature to strike discussion from these minutes.

Most of the procedures of the Westminster system have originated with the conventions, practices and precedents of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which are a part of what is known as the Constitution of the United Kingdom. Unlike the unwritten British constitution, most countries that use the Westminster system have codified the system in a written constitution.

However, uncodified conventions, practices and precedents continue to play a significant role in most countries, as many constitutions do not specify important elements of procedure: for example, some older constitutions using the Westminster system do not mention the existence of the cabinet and/or the prime minister, because these offices were taken for granted by the authors of these constitutions.

A motion of no confidence (alternatively vote of no confidence, censure motion, no-confidence motion, or confidence motion) is a parliamentary motion traditionally put before a parliament by the opposition in the hope of defeating or weakening a government, or, rarely by an erstwhile supporter who has lost confidence in the government. The motion is passed or rejected by means of a new parliamentary vote (a vote of no confidence).

Typically, when parliament votes no confidence, or where it fails to vote confidence, a government must respond in one of two ways:

* resign

* seek a parliamentary dissolution and request a general election

Ulasan

Catatan popular daripada blog ini

AMANAH: Banyak Permata, Tetapi Belum Menjadi Mahkota

Ini Catatan Terus Terang Dunia Mendan. Saya menulis catatan ini bukan untuk mengkritik Parti Amanah Negara (AMANAH), jauh sekali untuk memperlekehkan pengorbanan ahli dan pemimpinnya yang masih setia bekerja. Saya menulis kerana AMANAH sedang berhadapan dengan satu persoalan yang semakin sukar dielakkan: Selepas lebih sedekad ditubuhkan, apakah sebenarnya kedudukan AMANAH dalam pemikiran rakyat? Keputusan beberapa pilihan raya negeri memberikan isyarat yang cukup keras. Dalam PRN Melaka 2021, AMANAH bertanding di sembilan kerusi tetapi hanya menang satu menerusi Adly Zahari di Bukit Katil. Pakatan Harapan (PH) secara keseluruhannya hanya memperoleh lima daripada 28 kerusi, sedangkan Barisan Nasional (BN) menguasai 21 kerusi. Sebelum pilihan raya, terdapat keyakinan bahawa AMANAH mampu memenangi kesemua sembilan kerusi yang ditandinginya. Keputusan sebenar ternyata jauh daripada sasaran tersebut. Dalam PRN Sabah 2025 pula, AMANAH hanya diberikan satu kerusi, iaitu Sulabayan. Calonnya ti...

Di Sebalik Ucapan Anwar — Mampukah KEADILAN Gagah Selepas Luka Sabah, Johor & NS, Menuju Ujian Melaka?

Sebagai seorang yang menjadikan Parti KEADILAN sebagai subjek penyelidikan di peringkat PhD, saya melihat ucapan dasar Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim dalam Kongres Nasional KEADILAN 2026 di Melaka bukan sekadar pidato seorang presiden parti. Ia ialah ucapan seorang pengasas yang sedang melihat partinya berada pada persimpangan paling rumit sejak KEADILAN menjadi kerajaan. Anwar tidak lagi bercakap dari pentas pembangkang. Beliau bercakap sebagai Presiden KEADILAN, Perdana Menteri, ketua Kerajaan Perpaduan dan tokoh yang perlu mengimbangi cita-cita reformasi dengan realiti sebuah kerajaan gabungan. Pada masa sama, ucapan itu disampaikan ketika KEADILAN dan Pakatan Harapan sedang menerima beberapa amaran keras daripada pengundi. Di Sabah, PH hanya memenangi satu daripada 20 kerusi yang ditandingi dalam PRN 2025. Di Johor, PH sekadar memperoleh lapan daripada 56 kerusi, berbanding 48 kerusi yang dimenangi BN. Selepas itu, prestasi PH dalam PRN Negeri Sembilan turut memperlihatkan kemerosotan be...

Perbahasan Kongres KEADILAN 2026 — Berani Bersuara, Tetapi Sudahkah Berani Bermuhasabah?

Saya mengikuti perbahasan para perwakilan dalam Kongres Nasional KEADILAN 2026 di Melaka dengan satu persoalan besar: adakah kongres ini benar-benar sedang memugar reformasi , atau sekadar mengulangi semula bahasa perjuangan yang semakin kehilangan tenaga politiknya? Kongres kali ini membawa tema “Memugar Reformasi, Membina MADANI” . Tema ini tepat pada waktunya. KEADILAN memang memerlukan proses pemugaran—bukan sekadar terhadap slogan, tetapi terhadap pemikiran, organisasi, kepimpinan dan hubungannya dengan rakyat. Perbahasan melibatkan 16 pembahas daripada negeri, sayap dan beberapa kelompok khusus, termasuk veteran, OKU, Orang Asal dan wakil Borneo. Ini suatu perkembangan positif kerana memperluas keterwakilan suara dalam kongres. Secara rasmi, perbahasan disasarkan kepada isu ekonomi, pendidikan dan politik serta denyut nadi rakyat. Kenyataan rasmi KEADILAN Namun, dari sudut kandungan, perbahasan itu memperlihatkan dua wajah KEADILAN. Wajah pertama ialah sebuah parti yang masih mem...