Langkau ke kandungan utama

How to bring a government down

dari Changkat Ning

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Westminster system

The Westminster system is a democratic parliamentary system of government modelled after the British government (the Parliament of the United Kingdom). The term comes from the Palace of Westminster, the seat of the UK Parliament.

The system is a series of procedures for operating a legislature. It is used, or was once used, in the national legislatures and sub-national legislatures of most Commonwealth and ex-Commonwealth nations, beginning with the Canadian provinces and Australian colonies in the mid-19th century. There are other parliamentary systems whose procedures differ considerably from the Westminster system.

Key characteristics

Important features of the Westminster system include the following, although not all of the following aspects have been preserved in every Westminster-derived system:

* a sovereign or head of state who is the nominal or theoretical holder of executive power, and holds numerous reserve powers, but whose daily duties mainly consist of performing the role of a ceremonial figurehead. Examples include the British monarch, the presidents of many countries and state/provincial governors in federal systems.

* a head of government (or head of the executive), known as the prime minister (PM), premier or first minister, who is officially appointed by the head of state. In practice, the head of government is almost always the leader of the largest elected party in parliament.

* a de facto executive branch usually made up of members of the legislature with the senior members of the executive in a cabinet led by the head of government; such members execute executive authority on behalf of the nominal or theoretical executive authority.

* parliamentary opposition (a multi-party system).

* an elected legislature, often bicameral, in which at least one house is elected, although unicameral systems also exist; legislative members are usually elected by district in first-past-the-post elections (as opposed to country-wide proportional representation).(In this case, New Zealand presents an interesting change given its shift to proportional representation.)

* a lower house of parliament with an ability to dismiss a government by "withholding (or blocking) Supply" (rejecting a budget), passing a motion of no confidence, or defeating a confidence motion. The Westminster system enables a government to be defeated, or forced into a general election, independently of a new government being chosen.

* a parliament which can be dissolved and elections called at any time.

* parliamentary privilege, which allows the Legislature to discuss any issue deemed by itself to be relevant, without fear of consequences stemming from defamatory statements or records thereof.

* minutes of meetings, often known as Hansard, including an ability for the legislature to strike discussion from these minutes.

Most of the procedures of the Westminster system have originated with the conventions, practices and precedents of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which are a part of what is known as the Constitution of the United Kingdom. Unlike the unwritten British constitution, most countries that use the Westminster system have codified the system in a written constitution.

However, uncodified conventions, practices and precedents continue to play a significant role in most countries, as many constitutions do not specify important elements of procedure: for example, some older constitutions using the Westminster system do not mention the existence of the cabinet and/or the prime minister, because these offices were taken for granted by the authors of these constitutions.

A motion of no confidence (alternatively vote of no confidence, censure motion, no-confidence motion, or confidence motion) is a parliamentary motion traditionally put before a parliament by the opposition in the hope of defeating or weakening a government, or, rarely by an erstwhile supporter who has lost confidence in the government. The motion is passed or rejected by means of a new parliamentary vote (a vote of no confidence).

Typically, when parliament votes no confidence, or where it fails to vote confidence, a government must respond in one of two ways:

* resign

* seek a parliamentary dissolution and request a general election

Ulasan

Catatan popular daripada blog ini

The Personal Side of Ahmad Ibrahim by Mohamed Sidek Ahmad

dari ChangkatNingkeBTP A Artikel yang disertakan selapas coretan saya ini sebenarnya mengembalikan kenangan saya terhadap pensyarah saya yang sangat saya kasihi iaitu Allahyarham Tan Sri Ahmad Mohamed Ibrahim. Saya antara pelajar sains politik tahun akhir waktu itu di IIUM pada pertengahan tahun 1998 yang perlu mengambil subjek ITL atau Introduction to Law. Paling mengejutkan kumpulan kami ini adalah pensyarah yang akan mengendalikan kami adalah beliau yang memang sangat gah namanya waktu itu dan memegang jawatan besar di IIUM. Bagi kami ini satu penghormatan besar yang tidak tersangka terutama bagi saya secara peribadi dimana Allahyarham merupakan kenalan arwah bapa sewaktu beliau di Universiti Malaya. Malah, kumpulan tersebut merupakan yang pertama dan terakhir dari kalangan pelajar sains politik yang diajar dan dibimbing oleh Allahyarham Tan Sri. Jadual kuliah juga cukup menarik iaitu pada Isnin jam 7.30 pagi (Pada waktu itu jadual kuliah biasa adalah 9.00 pagi). Menariknya, ...

DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE BY CHANGE OF RELIGION: AN OVERVIEW FROM MALAYSIAN PLURAL LEGAL SYSTEM

dari ChangkatNingkeBTP Muhamad Wazir Muslat; Shahrizat Said; Hamdan Dato’ Salleh; Shariful Kamaruddin; Shamshinor Abd Azzis Qalam Bestari UNISEL, CDFS, UNISEL 1.0 INTRODUCTION In the name of Allah the Most Compassionate and the Most Merciful The issues on change of religion used to be discussed and sometimes become a hot one. Even though issues pertaining to conversion from one religion to another is a sensitive ones, but it keeps on happening and being mentioned by the media, magazines, newspaper and public. In a multi racial and religious society like Malaysia, where Islam is the Federal religion , conversion to Islam is not a surprised as the majority of the citizens are Muslim-Malays and government also applied the right to freedom of religion.

KERUNTUHAN INSTITUSI KEKELUARGAAN DI KALANGAN MASYARAKAT ISLAM SEMAKIN MERUNCING

dari ChangkatNingkeBTP Sumber: http://haziqinthehouse.blogspot.com/2010/11/keruntuhan-institusi-kekeluargaan-di.html Setiap keluarga mempunyai nilai dan maruah yang dipertahankan oleh ahli keluarganya sendiri. Keharmonian kekeluargaan dicapai melalui hubungan baik antara semua ahli keluarga. Perhubungan spiritual seperti agama, emosi seperti kasih sayang , sikap hormat – menghormati dan bertanggungjawab.  Oleh itu institusi kekeluargaan  adalah institusi yang terpenting dalam proses pembentukan individu yang sihat dari segi mental dan fizikal. Pada zaman yang serba moden ini kita sering mendengar dan terbaca di muka akhbar tentang permasalahan dan isu seperti  keruntuhan masyarakat . Sebagai contoh kes pebuangan anak luar nikah, kes penderaan kanak-kanak, kes penceraian dan sebagainya. Kekeluargaan merupakan salah satu aspek kehidupan manusia yang perlu diambil perhatian oleh syariat Islam. la dilihat sebagai wadah bagi lelaki dan wanita untuk mencari kedamaian da...