Langkau ke kandungan utama

How to bring a government down

dari Changkat Ning

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Westminster system

The Westminster system is a democratic parliamentary system of government modelled after the British government (the Parliament of the United Kingdom). The term comes from the Palace of Westminster, the seat of the UK Parliament.

The system is a series of procedures for operating a legislature. It is used, or was once used, in the national legislatures and sub-national legislatures of most Commonwealth and ex-Commonwealth nations, beginning with the Canadian provinces and Australian colonies in the mid-19th century. There are other parliamentary systems whose procedures differ considerably from the Westminster system.

Key characteristics

Important features of the Westminster system include the following, although not all of the following aspects have been preserved in every Westminster-derived system:

* a sovereign or head of state who is the nominal or theoretical holder of executive power, and holds numerous reserve powers, but whose daily duties mainly consist of performing the role of a ceremonial figurehead. Examples include the British monarch, the presidents of many countries and state/provincial governors in federal systems.

* a head of government (or head of the executive), known as the prime minister (PM), premier or first minister, who is officially appointed by the head of state. In practice, the head of government is almost always the leader of the largest elected party in parliament.

* a de facto executive branch usually made up of members of the legislature with the senior members of the executive in a cabinet led by the head of government; such members execute executive authority on behalf of the nominal or theoretical executive authority.

* parliamentary opposition (a multi-party system).

* an elected legislature, often bicameral, in which at least one house is elected, although unicameral systems also exist; legislative members are usually elected by district in first-past-the-post elections (as opposed to country-wide proportional representation).(In this case, New Zealand presents an interesting change given its shift to proportional representation.)

* a lower house of parliament with an ability to dismiss a government by "withholding (or blocking) Supply" (rejecting a budget), passing a motion of no confidence, or defeating a confidence motion. The Westminster system enables a government to be defeated, or forced into a general election, independently of a new government being chosen.

* a parliament which can be dissolved and elections called at any time.

* parliamentary privilege, which allows the Legislature to discuss any issue deemed by itself to be relevant, without fear of consequences stemming from defamatory statements or records thereof.

* minutes of meetings, often known as Hansard, including an ability for the legislature to strike discussion from these minutes.

Most of the procedures of the Westminster system have originated with the conventions, practices and precedents of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which are a part of what is known as the Constitution of the United Kingdom. Unlike the unwritten British constitution, most countries that use the Westminster system have codified the system in a written constitution.

However, uncodified conventions, practices and precedents continue to play a significant role in most countries, as many constitutions do not specify important elements of procedure: for example, some older constitutions using the Westminster system do not mention the existence of the cabinet and/or the prime minister, because these offices were taken for granted by the authors of these constitutions.

A motion of no confidence (alternatively vote of no confidence, censure motion, no-confidence motion, or confidence motion) is a parliamentary motion traditionally put before a parliament by the opposition in the hope of defeating or weakening a government, or, rarely by an erstwhile supporter who has lost confidence in the government. The motion is passed or rejected by means of a new parliamentary vote (a vote of no confidence).

Typically, when parliament votes no confidence, or where it fails to vote confidence, a government must respond in one of two ways:

* resign

* seek a parliamentary dissolution and request a general election

Ulasan

Catatan popular daripada blog ini

Tun Dr Siti Hasmah: Kasih yang Melihat Potensi Anak Cerebral Palsy

Pemergian Allahyarhamah Tun Dr Siti Hasmah Mohd Ali hari ini mengundang rasa dukacita yang mendalam. Saya merakamkan takziah kepada Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad dan seluruh keluarga. Malaysia kehilangan seorang tokoh yang dikenang kerana kelembutan budi dan kesediaannya mendekati mereka yang memerlukan perhatian.  Sebagai mantan Presiden Malaysian Advocate for Cerebral Palsy , saya ingin mengenang satu sisi khidmat beliau yang dekat di hati komuniti kami. Rekod Persatuan Kanak-Kanak Cerebral Palsy Pulau Pinang mencatatkan bahawa pada November 1981, Tun Dr Siti Hasmah melawat pusatnya dan membawa sumbangan daripada Badan Amal dan Kebajikan Tenaga Isteri-Isteri (BAKTI). Catatan itu mungkin ringkas, tetapi bagi sebuah pusat yang berusaha menyediakan pendidikan dan sokongan kepada anak-anak, kehadiran dan bantuan sedemikian mempunyai makna yang besar.  Kunjungan itu mengingatkan kita bahawa perjuangan anak cerebral palsy dan keluarga mereka sentiasa memerlukan lebih daripada simpati. M...

Selepas Peti Undi Ditutup: Siapa Paling Tepat Membaca Johor 2026?

Pilihan raya bukan sahaja menguji calon, parti dan jentera politik. Pilihan raya juga menguji ketepatan penganalisis. Sebelum rakyat Johor keluar mengundi, pelbagai institusi penyelidikan, penganalisis politik dan pusat kajian telah mengemukakan dapatan, pandangan serta jangkaan masing-masing. Ada yang berani mengunjurkan jumlah kerusi. Ada yang sekadar mengenal pasti kecenderungan pengundi. Ada pula yang membina beberapa senario berdasarkan kadar keluar mengundi, kekuatan jentera dan perubahan sokongan mengikut segmen pengundi. Selepas keputusan diumumkan, semua analisis tersebut wajar dinilai semula. Namun penilaian tidak boleh dibuat secara simplistik dengan bertanya: “Siapa teka jumlah kerusi dengan tepat?” Analisis politik yang baik perlu dinilai sekurang-kurangnya daripada tiga sudut: Adakah penganalisis membaca arah keputusan dengan betul? Sejauh manakah unjuran jumlah kerusinya menghampiri keputusan sebenar? Adakah faktor yang dikenal pasti benar-benar menjelaskan tingkah laku...

KEADILAN Siri 4 : KEADILAN Selangor, 12 Kerusi Disandang, di Mana Ruang untuk Berkembang?

KEADILAN masih memegang jawatan Menteri Besar Selangor, tetapi kedudukan itu tidak boleh dibaca sebagai ukuran kekuatan parti di seluruh negeri. Dalam Pilihan Raya Negeri (PRN) 2023, KEADILAN menang 12 daripada 20 kerusi yang ditandinginya. Pakatan Harapan (PH) memperoleh 32 kerusi, Barisan Nasional (BN) dua, manakala Perikatan Nasional (PN) menawan 22 daripada keseluruhan 56 kerusi DUN. Angka ini menunjukkan dua perkara serentak: KEADILAN kekal penting kepada kerajaan Selangor, tetapi ruang pertumbuhannya berada di kawasan yang paling sukar ditembusi.  Pertanyaan untuk pilihan raya akan datang bukan sekadar sama ada KEADILAN mampu mengekalkan pentadbiran negeri. Pertanyaan yang lebih menguji ialah: bolehkah KEADILAN meyakinkan pengundi di kerusi majoriti Melayu bahawa parti ini memahami kehidupan, nilai dan keresahan mereka? Peta 12 kerusi KEADILAN Keputusan 2023 memperlihatkan dua lapis kekuatan. Di Rawang, Kajang, Bukit Lanjan dan Sentosa, KEADILAN menang dengan majoriti melebi...