Langkau ke kandungan utama

How to bring a government down

dari Changkat Ning

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Westminster system

The Westminster system is a democratic parliamentary system of government modelled after the British government (the Parliament of the United Kingdom). The term comes from the Palace of Westminster, the seat of the UK Parliament.

The system is a series of procedures for operating a legislature. It is used, or was once used, in the national legislatures and sub-national legislatures of most Commonwealth and ex-Commonwealth nations, beginning with the Canadian provinces and Australian colonies in the mid-19th century. There are other parliamentary systems whose procedures differ considerably from the Westminster system.

Key characteristics

Important features of the Westminster system include the following, although not all of the following aspects have been preserved in every Westminster-derived system:

* a sovereign or head of state who is the nominal or theoretical holder of executive power, and holds numerous reserve powers, but whose daily duties mainly consist of performing the role of a ceremonial figurehead. Examples include the British monarch, the presidents of many countries and state/provincial governors in federal systems.

* a head of government (or head of the executive), known as the prime minister (PM), premier or first minister, who is officially appointed by the head of state. In practice, the head of government is almost always the leader of the largest elected party in parliament.

* a de facto executive branch usually made up of members of the legislature with the senior members of the executive in a cabinet led by the head of government; such members execute executive authority on behalf of the nominal or theoretical executive authority.

* parliamentary opposition (a multi-party system).

* an elected legislature, often bicameral, in which at least one house is elected, although unicameral systems also exist; legislative members are usually elected by district in first-past-the-post elections (as opposed to country-wide proportional representation).(In this case, New Zealand presents an interesting change given its shift to proportional representation.)

* a lower house of parliament with an ability to dismiss a government by "withholding (or blocking) Supply" (rejecting a budget), passing a motion of no confidence, or defeating a confidence motion. The Westminster system enables a government to be defeated, or forced into a general election, independently of a new government being chosen.

* a parliament which can be dissolved and elections called at any time.

* parliamentary privilege, which allows the Legislature to discuss any issue deemed by itself to be relevant, without fear of consequences stemming from defamatory statements or records thereof.

* minutes of meetings, often known as Hansard, including an ability for the legislature to strike discussion from these minutes.

Most of the procedures of the Westminster system have originated with the conventions, practices and precedents of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which are a part of what is known as the Constitution of the United Kingdom. Unlike the unwritten British constitution, most countries that use the Westminster system have codified the system in a written constitution.

However, uncodified conventions, practices and precedents continue to play a significant role in most countries, as many constitutions do not specify important elements of procedure: for example, some older constitutions using the Westminster system do not mention the existence of the cabinet and/or the prime minister, because these offices were taken for granted by the authors of these constitutions.

A motion of no confidence (alternatively vote of no confidence, censure motion, no-confidence motion, or confidence motion) is a parliamentary motion traditionally put before a parliament by the opposition in the hope of defeating or weakening a government, or, rarely by an erstwhile supporter who has lost confidence in the government. The motion is passed or rejected by means of a new parliamentary vote (a vote of no confidence).

Typically, when parliament votes no confidence, or where it fails to vote confidence, a government must respond in one of two ways:

* resign

* seek a parliamentary dissolution and request a general election

Ulasan

Catatan popular daripada blog ini

PhD Itu Amanah, Bukan Alasan Tanpa Penghujung

Ada pensyarah yang sangat petah berbicara tentang kecemerlangan akademik. Mereka mengajar pelajar tentang disiplin, pengurusan masa, budaya membaca, pemikiran kritis dan kepentingan menyiapkan tugasan mengikut tempoh. Namun, apabila sampai kepada pengajian sendiri, segala prinsip itu seakan-akan hilang. Tahun berganti tahun. Semester bertukar semester. Tajuk masih berubah. Proposal belum selesai. Data belum dikutip. Bab masih tergantung. Penyelia pula sering dijadikan alasan. Katanya terlalu sibuk mengajar. Banyak mesyuarat. Tugas pentadbiran bertambah. Keluarga memerlukan perhatian. Kesihatan tidak menentu. Penyelia sukar ditemui. Universiti terlalu birokratik. Tajuk terlalu kompleks. Data sukar diperoleh. Sebahagian alasan itu mungkin benar. Kita tidak boleh menafikan bahawa perjalanan PhD memang penuh cabaran. Ada yang diuji dengan kesihatan, kewangan, keluarga, kehilangan orang tersayang, pertukaran penyelia, masalah data dan tekanan emosi yang tidak kelihatan. Kita perlu berempati...

Almarhum Prof. Dr. Shaharuddin Badaruddin: Murabbi Cakna OKU, Pemangkin Awal Advokasi OKU Selangor

Ada perjuangan yang bermula dengan dasar. Ada perjuangan yang bermula dengan kertas kerja. Ada perjuangan yang bermula dengan mesyuarat panjang dan perbincangan rasmi. Tetapi ada juga perjuangan yang bermula dengan satu panggilan hati. Bagi saya, apabila Dasar OKU Selangor akhirnya dilancarkan, ia bukan sekadar satu dokumen dasar negeri. Ia bukan sekadar pencapaian pentadbiran. Ia adalah sambungan daripada satu perjalanan panjang advokasi, kasih sayang, kesedaran dan keberanian moral untuk meletakkan OKU sebagai sebahagian penting dalam agenda pembangunan negeri. Dan dalam perjalanan itu, satu nama tidak mungkin saya lupakan. Almarhum Prof. Dr. Shaharuddin Badaruddin. Ramai mengenali beliau sebagai seorang ahli akademik, pemimpin universiti, pemikir masyarakat dan tokoh politik yang bersahaja. Tetapi bagi saya, beliau lebih daripada itu. Beliau ialah seorang murabbi. Seorang insan yang tidak hanya berbicara tentang kemanusiaan, tetapi menghidupkan kemanusiaan itu dalam tindakan. Hari i...

PARTI WAWASAN NEGARA: RUMAH BAHARU, RETAK LAMA DAN PERTARUNGAN MENGUASAI POLITIK MELAYU

Parti politik boleh diumumkan dalam sehari. Nama boleh dipilih, logo boleh direka dan pentas boleh dipenuhi ribuan penyokong. Namun, akar politik tidak tumbuh melalui pengumuman. Ia memerlukan jentera, calon, pembiayaan, naratif dan kepercayaan rakyat. Pada 13 Jun 2026, Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin mengumumkan penubuhan Parti Wawasan Negara dalam Konvensyen RESET Malaysia di Tanah Merah. Nama parti tersebut dikatakan dicadangkan oleh Presiden PAS, Tan Sri Abdul Hadi Awang. Pada majlis sama, parti baharu itu diumumkan akan menyertai PRN Johor dan Negeri Sembilan menggunakan lambang Perikatan Nasional.  Namun, kelahiran Parti Wawasan Negara bukan sekadar penambahan sebuah lagi parti dalam daftar politik Malaysia. Ia sebenarnya tanda bahawa perebutan kepimpinan blok pembangkang sudah memasuki fasa baharu . Persoalannya bukan semata-mata sama ada Parti Wawasan Negara mampu memenangi banyak kerusi. Persoalan yang lebih besar ialah: Siapakah yang akan mengetuai pembangkang Melayu selepas ...