Langkau ke kandungan utama

Kuan Yew’s trip for the future

dari Changkat Ning

An excellent article form one of my favorite columnists, Jaceline Tan.
from The Star Online, 16th June 2009.

SOME billed the landmark visit of Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew to Malaysia as “a trip down memory lane.” It has been anything but that.

For a start, the Minister Mentor of Singapore is not the sentimental sort and, second, this particular lane in history does not exactly hold pleasant memories for him.

This elder statesman probably left for home yesterday after his eight-day visit armed with insight and perspectives about this country and its politics that no other contemporary leader in Singapore has ever been privileged to.

He met an array of people from the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and Prime Minister to the royal figures and political leaders of several states as well as a string of politicians from both sides of the divide.

“It was really unprecedented. The people he met included the who’s who of Malaysian politics,” said one Pakatan Rakyat MP.

And it was all the more curious because it took place without the usual anti-Singapore voices filling the air or showy protests by Umno Youth.

VIPs cleared their diaries for his courtesy call and many bent over backwards to hear what he had to say and to tell him what he wanted to know.

The sole exception was perhaps Negri Sembilan Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan, who resisted being drawn into any political discussion so much so that some of the conversation had to actually meander down memory lane.

But Kuan Yew’s crosshairs were on the Pakatan states.

He is curious about the new players in these states. As most of those he met noted, Lee arrived very well-informed but he wanted to meet them to fine-tune what he already knew and make his assessment.

They had the sense that he wanted to get to know them for “future purposes” and several of them were invited for more discussion in Singapore.

One of them was Kelantan Mentri Besar Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat who was savvy enough about Malaysia-Singapore relations to not say yes; he told Lee it would be too tiring for him to make the trip. Yet, Nik Aziz had been to China four times, as Lee pointed out.

It seemed like the PAS side also tried some mind games on him. The translator who sat in at the Lee-Nik Aziz meeting had studied and worked in the United States for eight years – their way of telling Lee that well-educated Malays were now with them.

When he met Nik Aziz’s right hand man Datuk Husam Musa, the latter brought along his assistant, a PhD holder who had spent 13 years in Britain.

Singapore leaders have been observing Malaysia’s politics with some concern since the 2008 election and they are not taking the Pakatan claims about capturing Putrajaya lightly.

At his meeting with PAS president Datuk Seri Hadi Awang, Lee, who takes a keen interest in Malaysian and Indonesian affairs, was keen to know how foreign policy, especially that towards Singapore, would change if PAS took over.

“He wanted to see for himself, to hear from the horse’s mouth. He also understands that the head of any government in this country must be from a Malay-based party,” said one of those at the meeting.

The other point here of course is that he chose to meet only one of Pakatan’s contenders for the prime minister’s post.

Some said he gave Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim a miss because they have issues dating back to when Anwar was still the deputy prime minister.

But Lee understood the political sensitivities and knew where to draw the line on his trip.

His longest session was with the Penang leaders. The DAP and PAP go back a long way and the discussion probably had more common ground than elsewhere.

The Penang leaders found him sympathetic to their issues but they also thought he was way off on some of his assessments. They probably did not appreciate Lee’s scepticism that Pakatan could capture Putrajaya by the next elections.

When asked by the press to sum up the meeting with Lee, Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said, among other things: “Lee Kuan Yew is a historical figure. For me and my colleagues, today is a historic occasion, meeting a piece of living history.”

Lee’s visit was to see and hear for himself the political changes that have taken place in Malaysia and getting acquainted with some of the new players.

He is not totally convinced that Pakatan has what it takes for a home run in the next elections; at the same time, he does not intend his country to be caught flat-footed.

Underlying all this is the niggling fear that his own citizens may take their politics ala Malaysia.

Many have wondered at Lee’s political longevity. Some of those he met last week had a glimpse of how he does it and, that is, to be a step ahead of others, even at age 85.

However, not everyone was pleased about the red carpet treatment.

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, describing Lee as “The Little Emperor” was dripping sarcasm when he blogged about how “all those who met the great man from the little country were lectured on how Malaysia should be run.”

Ulasan

Catatan popular daripada blog ini

Siapa Kata Apa? Meneliti Analisis Penganalisis Politik Menjelang PRN Johor 2026

Menjelang Pilihan Raya Negeri (PRN) Johor 2026, rakyat disajikan dengan pelbagai analisis, tinjauan, ulasan media dan pandangan pakar. Ada yang berasaskan kajian lapangan, ada yang menggunakan data statistik dan pengalaman akademik, manakala sebahagiannya merupakan tafsiran terhadap dinamik politik semasa. Namun, satu perkara sering mengelirukan masyarakat ialah kecenderungan menyamakan kajian pendapat awam , analisis politik , senario pilihan raya dan ramalan keputusan . Hakikatnya, keempat-empatnya mempunyai tujuan dan metodologi yang berbeza. Artikel ini menghimpunkan pandangan beberapa institusi penyelidikan dan penganalisis politik utama bagi membantu pembaca memahami apa yang sebenarnya mereka katakan menjelang PRN Johor 2026. Memahami Empat Kategori Analisis Sebelum meneliti pandangan setiap penganalisis, penting untuk membezakan empat kategori berikut: Dapatan Kajian (Survey Findings) Merupakan hasil tinjauan saintifik terhadap sampel pengundi menggunakan metodologi penyelidik...

PRN Johor dan Piala Dunia 2026: Bila Parti Politik Masuk Padang Bola

Ada dua perkara yang mampu membuat rakyat Malaysia tiba-tiba menjadi penganalisis sepenuh masa: politik dan bola sepak. Bila Piala Dunia berlangsung, semua orang tahu formasi. Bila PRN datang, semua orang tahu sentimen akar umbi. Yang menariknya, Piala Dunia 2026 dan PRN Johor kali ini seperti berjalan dalam bahasa yang sama: ada pasukan lama yang mahu kekal sebagai kuasa besar, ada pasukan muda yang mahu menggugat, ada pasukan yang kaya sejarah tetapi sedang mencari semula magis, dan ada juga pasukan kecil yang masuk padang bukan semata-mata mahu menang piala, tetapi mahu merosakkan permainan orang lain. Johor pula bukan padang biasa. Ini bukan sekadar perlawanan persahabatan hujung minggu. Ini padang besar, rumputnya tebal, penyokongnya garang, sejarahnya panjang. Di sinilah UMNO mahu membuktikan ia masih Perancis politik Melayu Johor. Di sinilah PH mahu menunjukkan mereka bukan sekadar pasukan yang cantik di atas kertas. Di sinilah PN mahu menguji sama ada gelombang mereka boleh sam...

Selepas Peti Undi Ditutup: Siapa Paling Tepat Membaca Johor 2026?

Pilihan raya bukan sahaja menguji calon, parti dan jentera politik. Pilihan raya juga menguji ketepatan penganalisis. Sebelum rakyat Johor keluar mengundi, pelbagai institusi penyelidikan, penganalisis politik dan pusat kajian telah mengemukakan dapatan, pandangan serta jangkaan masing-masing. Ada yang berani mengunjurkan jumlah kerusi. Ada yang sekadar mengenal pasti kecenderungan pengundi. Ada pula yang membina beberapa senario berdasarkan kadar keluar mengundi, kekuatan jentera dan perubahan sokongan mengikut segmen pengundi. Selepas keputusan diumumkan, semua analisis tersebut wajar dinilai semula. Namun penilaian tidak boleh dibuat secara simplistik dengan bertanya: “Siapa teka jumlah kerusi dengan tepat?” Analisis politik yang baik perlu dinilai sekurang-kurangnya daripada tiga sudut: Adakah penganalisis membaca arah keputusan dengan betul? Sejauh manakah unjuran jumlah kerusinya menghampiri keputusan sebenar? Adakah faktor yang dikenal pasti benar-benar menjelaskan tingkah laku...